<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wordpress 2.6!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://personal.amy-wong.com/2008/07/15/wordpress-26/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://personal.amy-wong.com/2008/07/15/wordpress-26/</link>
	<description>Amy&#039;s ramblings about films, music, tv, and all things entertainment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:47:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://personal.amy-wong.com/2008/07/15/wordpress-26/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personal.amy-wong.com/?p=575#comment-692</guid>
		<description>=D
Yah, that fix will have to do~~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>=D<br />
Yah, that fix will have to do~~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1Earth</title>
		<link>http://personal.amy-wong.com/2008/07/15/wordpress-26/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>1Earth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personal.amy-wong.com/?p=575#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Hi Amy - thanks for your feedback. I checked that my server can handle the URIs without index.php (it could), changed it and upgraded to 2.6 hassle free.

Now my URIs are index.php&#039;less, but both the URI with and without index.php work that same.

Hoorah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amy &#8211; thanks for your feedback. I checked that my server can handle the URIs without index.php (it could), changed it and upgraded to 2.6 hassle free.</p>
<p>Now my URIs are index.php&#8217;less, but both the URI with and without index.php work that same.</p>
<p>Hoorah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://personal.amy-wong.com/2008/07/15/wordpress-26/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personal.amy-wong.com/?p=575#comment-690</guid>
		<description>Actually, I just checked some of the pages that I know rank on Google, and they already show up without the index.php thing in them. Yah, I know... surprising, didn&#039;t expect it to be this quick. Also, redirecting seems to work in older links that include the index.php bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I just checked some of the pages that I know rank on Google, and they already show up without the index.php thing in them. Yah, I know&#8230; surprising, didn&#8217;t expect it to be this quick. Also, redirecting seems to work in older links that include the index.php bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1Earth</title>
		<link>http://personal.amy-wong.com/2008/07/15/wordpress-26/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>1Earth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personal.amy-wong.com/?p=575#comment-689</guid>
		<description>Ok, but now how about all your pages that got indexed with index.php in front of them.  With your fix, will they automatically be redirected to the new URI without index.php?

I had this same problem last night/this morning (why do we upgrade in the wee hours of the morning?), but after downgrading again, I didn&#039;t want to fiddle with my URIs as there&#039;s many in Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, but now how about all your pages that got indexed with index.php in front of them.  With your fix, will they automatically be redirected to the new URI without index.php?</p>
<p>I had this same problem last night/this morning (why do we upgrade in the wee hours of the morning?), but after downgrading again, I didn&#8217;t want to fiddle with my URIs as there&#8217;s many in Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
